malaysiakini logo
story-image
mk-logo
News
Majority and minority judgments in Malaysiakini's contempt case
Published:  Feb 19, 2021 2:35 PM
Updated: Feb 21, 2021 12:56 AM
ADS

This morning, the Federal Court ruled that Malaysiakini is liable for contempt of court over its readers’ comments and fined the company RM500,000.

The hefty sentence, however, does not extend to its editor-in-chief Steven Gan who was found not guilty of the same charge.

The seven-person bench chaired by Court of Appeal president Rohana Yusuf delivered the 6-1 majority decision with dissenting judgment by Federal Court judge P Nallini.

Besides Rohana, the other panel members who form the majority ruling are chief judge of the High Court of Malaya Azahar Mohamed; chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim; and Federal Court judges Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat and Abdul Rahman Sebli.

This marked the first time Malaysiakini is being cited for contempt of court in its 21-year history.

Read the press summary of the majority and minority judgments.

(Editor's note: This article has been amended to change the word full judgment to press summary)

Related reports:

Umno leaders worried M'kini decision will 'kill' freedom of speech

Malaysiakini seeks public's help to raise RM500k after contempt conviction

Malaysiakini fined RM500,000 for contempt of court

Malaysiakini in contempt over readers’ comments, rules Federal Court

LIVE | Huge fine a body blow, says Gan

Support pours in for Malaysiakini, concerns raised over press freedom

Majority and minority judgments in Malaysiakini's contempt case

Foreign missions concerned over press freedom after Mkini contempt ruling

Lawyers: Decision in M'kini case may curtail other news sites, social media

Portals now need to check readers' comments due to court ruling: lawyer

COMMENT | Is today the beginning of the real emergency?

Malaysiakini exceeds RM500k fundraising target for hefty court fine

View Comments