Both govt and private sectors must be accountable for their actions.

Cabinet decides longhouse residents to get permanent homes.

They say the cabinet is already excessive in its size.

The proverbial David has slayed Goliath in the highest court in the land. 

UPDATED 11.23AM | DBKL loses appeal to develop parts of the residential area.

Counsel argues that KL mayor not involved in the issuance of development order.

It was always intended for mixed development, the court hears.

TTDI residents attempted to adduce new evidence from the report.

UPDATED | 3.50PM | They are appealing to reinstate development order for the public park.

This is due to the latest MCO, says the lawyer who acts for DBKL.

Case pertains to the proposed development of a high-rise residential project in the park.

Four parties are going to the Federal Court to reinstate a development order to develop a portion of the public park.

Concentrate resources on providing permanent housing for the Bukit Kiara longhouse families.

It is important for us to preserve green lungs for our future generations.

UPDATED 4.52PM | A development order was given to Yayasan Wilayah Persekutuan, Memang Perkasa in 2017 for a high rise on park.

On the renaming of the park, he says it was 'merely a suggestion' by the DBKL.

The association claims that DBKL wanted to alter the status quo of the park.

The residents' association say the relevant lawsuit is pending with the Court of Appeal.

QUESTION TIME | If abuse of authority is proved in Taman Rimba Kiara case, the gov't and public officer are liable for damages.

City Hall has deep pockets, but the residents who fought against the development of a portion of Taman Rimba Kiara deserve free legal aid, she adds.

LETTER | Drawing parallels between Taman Tugu and Taman Rimba Kiara cannot be any further from the truth.

One taman is public green space and the other is a project that is seen by some to only profit developers.

S Rajah says she should not just consider the needs of residents near Taman Rimba Kiara.

Segambut MP says some of the reports lodged against the project date back to before GE14.

Movement of shareholdings and director appointments were coordinated, claims watchdog NGO.

It will also be submitted to other government agencies for feedback, says Khalid Abdul Samad.

'We are willing to compromise,' adds the Segambut MP.

He also dismisses allegations of conflict of interest stemming from his position in the landowner, the Federal Territory Foundation.

LETTER | Clearing the misconceptions on scaled-down development in Taman Rimba Kiara.